The defendant also argues that it was error to refuse to instruct the jury that only licensed physicians can practice medicine and that the customary standards of the community establish the duty of the hospital, and to give any instruction which indicated it was the duty of the hospital to supervise the competence of its staff members.
The following hospital personnel were available in the medical-surgical area during the shifts designated: I had access at the hospital to some good orthopedic books As to consultation, there is no dispute that the hospital failed to review Dr.
They are authoritative as a group. I was on emergency service on November 5, See Rule and comment.
This evidence aided the jury in deciding what was feasible and what the defendant knew or should have known. Kaneland Community Unit District, 18 Ill.
It may be, however, that Moore v. The second major contention advanced by the defendant in this court is that it was prejudicial error to permit the cross-examination of its expert witnesses concerning the views of recognized authorities in their fields, upon the ground that the experts did not purport to base their opinions upon the views of these authorities.
He could not recall the names of any books on orthopedic procedures he had studied in the last ten years to update his major orthopedic procedures. Alexander, who was on emergency call that day, treated him. An individual becomes an expert by studying and absorbing a body of knowledge.
Used student nurses for post-operative care of the patient who were unskilled in bone injuries and infections resulting therefrom so as not adequately to recognize the presence of infection and to provide care for the patient, or capable of preventing or checking the spread of infection; H.
Only qualified doctors of medicine, legally licensed to practice in that state, or surgeons, should be admitted to membership. Northwestern University, Ill. He remained at Barnes Hospital until December 16, at which time he was permitted to return to his home.
It is supported by the considerations that support the hearsay rule, but the inapplicability of those considerations to scientific works has been convincingly demonstrated by Wigmore.
There was a very noticeable "terrifically foul stench" in the room. Vera Bezruki was a practical nurse employed by the defendant who helped apply the cast. Other courts have gotten tired of fanatics wasting their time and are starting to fine those lawyers who keep refiling these charges.
The plaintiff was brought into the emergency room of the Charleston Hospital sometime between 3: Those were the books named by Dr. The evidence before the jury is set forth at length in the opinion of the Appellate Court and need not be stated in detail here.
Alexander, pursuant to a covenant not to sue. Present-day hospitals, as their manner of operation plainly demonstrates, do far more than furnish facilities for treatment. The evidence was extensive, and the record, abstracts, and briefs here are lengthy.
Darling has a major impact on the liability of health care organizations. The court enunciated the corporate negligence doctrine under which hospitals.
50 Ill. App. 2d () N.E.2d Dorrence Kenneth Darling II, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, Dorrence Kenneth Darling, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. A hospital may be liable for the negligence of its staff. There is no reality to the idea that a hospital provides facilities only and does not claim to act through its staff doctors and nurses.
Modern hospitals provide facilities and much more. Facts. Dorrence Darling II (plaintiff) broke his right leg while playing in a college football game when he was years-old. In the emergency room of Charleston Community Memorial Hospital (defendant), Dr. John R. Alexander (defendant) treated Dorrence by applying traction and placing the leg in a plaster cast.
Medical Malpractice Case Compliments of Versuslaw Classic Hospital Liability for Medical Staff Member Liability - Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill.2dN.E.2d14 A.L.R.3d (Ill. Sep 29, ). Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hosp. case brief Darling v.
Charleston Community Memorial Hosp. case brief Standards for hospital accreditation and the state licensing regulations demonstrated that the medical profession regarded it as both desirable and feasible that a hospital assume certain responsibilities for the care of .Darling v charleston community memorial hospital